Abdullah Mullah shuddered as he thought back to the early 1990s. In his sprawling neighborhood, the center of Egypt's radical Islamist movement, his wife was beaten on the street for wearing jeans and he was visited by thugs "concerned" about his irregular mosque attendance.
Imbaba was a place the police feared and the militants ruled. Neighborhoods like this, teaming with devout Muslims, may have been considered fertile ground for Al Qaeda's goal of building a global movement. But six years after 9/11, Osama bin Laden's group appears to have attracted few loyal followers here. In fact, the militants who once reigned in Imbaba are all but invisible.
What has happened in Egypt represents an overlooked success story in much of the Arab world. While Muslim anger toward the US and its Arab allies has soared in the post-9/11 war on terrorism, and the Iraq war has been a recruiting tool for Al Qaeda, there is little chance militant Islamists can seize power power in any of the region's established states.
But this has come at a price. The Egyptian story is one of how an effective, often brutal, security establishment has pushed militant Islamists to the fringes. Today, Egypt has as firm a grip on Imbaba as it does on the rest of the country. Political Islam, however, still has great appeal for millions of Egyptians, but most of them are attracted to the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that repudiated violence decades ago. Indeed, there are exceptions to the clout that militant Islamists hold within large segments of Arab society. Hamas, the Palestinian group which now controls the Gaza Strip, is considered a terrorist outfit by the US, Israel, and the European Union. But its political platform is far from Al Qaeda's. It uses violence to extract land from Israel, not in the service of establishing an Islamic caliphate, a key Al Qaeda aim.
In Egypt, the hard line from the state in dealing with radical groups also comes with a growing Arab revulsion of Al Qaeda's indiscriminate violence and thuggish behavior.
"These groups have of course been around for a long time. But what people discovered with them is that they're incredibly rough and rigidly ideological," says Diaa Rashwan, an expert on political Islam at the Al Ahram Center for Strategic and International Studies in Cairo. "Their methods weren't about winning people over, being with them, but imposing upon them. No people in the world like that." Full story....
It's good to hear some positives coming from the Middle East. That's why I'll post it whenever I come across something like this.
2 comments:
Dr.
Thanks for the informative post. Personally, I continue to question whether democracy in the Arab Middle East is a goal to support in the near term. In the 2005 Egyptian parlimentary elections, there 150 Muslim Brotherhood candidates who ran as independents and these candidates did quite well.
Hamas was democratically elected by the Palestinians.
I'm not sure what the solution is here but it does seem as if our most steadfast allies in the region, w/ the exception of Israel, are monarchies.
Regards.
Monarchies?
Hamas & Fatah? Two violent and corrupt hate Militia. One funded by Persian Shi'a, and the other by Saudi Wahhabi. Label them more accurately as Pious/thug Racketeers!
Choose One. What do you get? reb
www.lazyonebenn.blogspot.com
Post a Comment