tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077080.post1586711219629229975..comments2023-08-18T10:14:37.977-05:00Comments on WhenEvilProspers: Yes, she DID stop that bridge!John Washburnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04182558340478176184noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077080.post-83987775810031635902008-09-19T15:44:00.000-05:002008-09-19T15:44:00.000-05:00Palin only squashed the bridge when Alaska's share...Palin only squashed the bridge when Alaska's share was going to cost the state too much. BUT she didn't stop the road being built to a bridge that won't be built. It is now a ROAD TO NOWHERE! I don't know what the developers are thinking, still trying to bring more homes and commercialism to Gravina Island without a bridge. There are so many other places to build up, why do they want to build up that one island? Something fishy goin' on.<BR/><BR/>Emilie<BR/>Port Orchard, WAAuntyemhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00178076598997617829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077080.post-58215664445675218942008-09-12T15:46:00.000-05:002008-09-12T15:46:00.000-05:00Look Doc. She supported the bridge. Then the ear...Look Doc. She supported the bridge. Then the earmark was pulled and she changed her position. That's fine.<BR/><BR/>But her stump speech leads any dispassionate listener to believe that she opposed the bridge from the git go and that she opposed the earmark.<BR/><BR/>This is more than disingenuous. She should just stoi and the issue would die a well deserved death.<BR/><BR/>But everytime she delivers that speech, I just say to myself, in the words of Delbert McClinton; "The more your lip keep movin', the more youy keep losin' ground."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com